Top 10 US Counties by No-Vehicle Household Share

PlainFoodAccess ranks all 3,144 US counties by the share of households with no vehicle.

Research period:

Compiled by PlainFoodAccess on 2024-12-31

Research question

Which US counties have the largest share of households without a vehicle, and how does no-vehicle household share interact with low-food-access classification and median household income?

Methodology

This ranking reflects the data currently in our database, sourced from the agency referenced in the citation below and updated automatically as new filings are processed.

Coverage and exclusions: the source agency occasionally suppresses values for confidentiality, small sample size, or quality control, and suppressed rows are excluded from this ranking rather than shown as zero. If the agency later revises a figure, the revised value replaces the old one automatically the next time our data is refreshed.

Data provenance: we pull each release as it becomes available and normalize it into our database; a later release simply supersedes the one before it, so readers never see a mix of old and new figures on the same page.

Comparability across years: when the source agency revises its release schedule, definitions, or coverage, we note the affected years on the methodology page so readers can compare like-with-like rather than across a changed measurement.

Editorial governance: a named editor reviews every ranking page before publication (see the byline above). If an entity disputes a figure attributed to it, corrections are checked against the official source record before any change is made.

Every number on this page can be traced back to its source by following the entity links and the citation below, so independent verification never requires anything beyond the original public source.

See the methodology page for the complete ETL pipeline, source vintage, and column lineage.

Top 10 US Counties by No-Vehicle Household Share

Live data: reflects the current dataset

1. Kusilvak Census Area82.9%2. New York County78.0%3. Northwest Arctic Borough64.6%4. Bronx County61.1%5. Bethel Census Area57.7%6. Kings County56.4%7. Nome Census Area55.9%8. Lake and Peninsula Borough43.5%9. Queens County37.4%10. North Slope Borough37.0%

The ranked top 10

Every row below reflects the current 10-record dataset. Reload the page after new data is processed to see the latest values.

# County Population No-vehicle % Low-access % SNAP %
1 Kusilvak Census Area 8,176 82.9% 0.0% 51.4%
2 New York County 1,629,477 78.0% 0.0% 14.4%
3 Northwest Arctic Borough 7,441 64.6% 46.2% 35.8%
4 Bronx County 1,404,779 61.1% 0.6% 38.6%
5 Bethel Census Area 18,394 57.7% 68.6% 42.4%
6 Kings County 2,631,580 56.4% 0.0% 22.9%
7 Nome Census Area 9,866 55.9% 23.1% 29.4%
8 Lake and Peninsula Borough 1,013 43.5% 100.0% 29.3%
9 Queens County 2,323,052 37.4% 0.6% 15.9%
10 North Slope Borough 10,810 37.0% 37.9% 14.0%

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture / U.S. Census Bureau, USDA ERS Food Access Research Atlas, ACS no-vehicle overlay. Values reflect the current dataset, refreshed as new filings are processed.

Findings

Top entity in the ranking

The top-ranked record in this dataset is Kusilvak Census Area, with a value of 82.9% on the No-vehicle % column. The full top-10 set is rendered in the table above. Every value comes directly from the current dataset; no number is hardcoded into this page. When the source agency publishes a revision, the ranking and the prose around it update automatically.

Distribution shape

The gap between the top-ranked record (82.9%) and the 10th-ranked record (37.0%) characterizes how concentrated the top of the distribution is. Where the top value is many multiples of the median value of the visible set, the population is highly concentrated, a small number of entities accumulate the bulk of the measured quantity. Where the top and bottom of the visible set are close together, the distribution is relatively flat across the top end. The full distribution beyond this top-10 cut is summarized in the aggregate context section below and explored in the linked entity profiles.

Aggregate context

Across the full population behind this ranking, here are the summary statistics: how many records exist in total, the sum of the ranking metric across all qualifying records, and the mean per-record value. The methodology page documents the exact filter applied (records with null or zero values on the ranking metric are excluded). This aggregate row is computed from the same dataset that powers the ranking above.

Source provenance

The records in this ranking originate from U.S. Department of Agriculture / U.S. Census Bureau, specifically the USDA ERS Food Access Research Atlas, ACS no-vehicle overlay. PlainFoodAccess ingests the source vintage published by the agency and keeps this page current, there is no static export carrying stale numbers, and a newly published dataset is reflected here within hours. The methodology page documents the source URL, the vintage date, and the steps applied to prepare the data.

Why this ranking matters

Rankings like this one let a reader scan a population quickly and identify outliers, concentrations, and patterns that warrant deeper investigation. The detail pages linked from each entity in the table above give the full per-entity context: time-series history where available, related metrics from adjacent tables, and links onward to the underlying source records. The methodology page explains how an entity earns inclusion in the dataset and how the ranking column is computed at the source.

What this analysis cannot tell us

No-vehicle household share is a Census ACS metric counting households reporting zero vehicles available, it does not distinguish between voluntary car-free urban households with high transit access and households without a vehicle because of cost or other constraints. Counties with strong public-transit infrastructure (urban cores, transit-rich metros) will show high no-vehicle share without implying food-access constraint. Median household income from ACS is a 5-year rolling estimate. The low_access_pct overlap measures spatial coincidence at the census-tract level aggregated to county; intra-county pattern can vary substantially.

Secondary cut from the same source

Top 10 large-population counties (>500k) by no-vehicle household share

1. New York County78.0%2. Bronx County61.1%3. Kings County56.4%4. Queens County37.4%5. District of Columbia36.0%6. Hudson County33.4%7. Suffolk County31.6%8. San Francisco County30.2%9. Philadelphia County27.9%10. Baltimore city26.7%

Sources