Signature · 36.9% low-access (83rd pct)
Fannin County, TX
Fannin County sits in the upper national band on low-access (36.9%, +14.8 pts vs U.S.), with SNAP/vehicle context from ACS 2024.
- 36.9%
- low-access pop.
- 2
- food-desert tracts
- 10.3%
- on SNAP
- 37K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Fannin County, TX
LA-ELEVATED · ABOVE-NATIONAL · LILA-POCKET · SNAP-LIGHT · VEH-OK · DENSITY-MIXED
- LA-ELEVATED 36.9% low-access
- ABOVE-NATIONAL +14.8 pts vs US
- LILA-POCKET 2 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-LIGHT 10.3% SNAP
- VEH-OK 3.4% no vehicle
- DENSITY-MIXED 22% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Goliad County ( -0.1 pts)
Upper-band low-access
Fannin County sits in the upper national band (36.9%, #518 of 3,079) with 2 LILA tracts.
- #518
- national by low-access %
- #54
- in TX
- 5
- low-access tracts
- 4K
- food-desert residents
Upper-band counties often pair elevated low-access with clustered LILA tracts. Low access = >1 mile urban / >10 miles rural.
Signature read: 36.9% low-access (83rd pct) (+14.8 pts vs U.S. low-access).
How Fannin County compares nationally
Relative to the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA food-access data, Fannin County's 36.9% low-access share is elevated, higher than 83% of them and ranked #521 most-affected nationwide.
Fannin County's elevated USDA tier split
9 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 2 LILA.
By USDA urbanicity classification, Fannin County has 2 urban and 7 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Fannin County vs nearby high low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Texas, not a full county-board reprint
- Throckmorton
Throckmorton 100%
100 % low-access
- Dawson 37.5
Dawson 37.5%
37.5 % low-access
- San Saba 37.3
San Saba 37.3%
37.3 % low-access
- Fannin 36.9
Fannin 36.9%
36.9 % low-access
- Goliad 36.8
Goliad 36.8%
36.8 % low-access
- McLennan 36.8
McLennan 36.8%
36.8 % low-access
- Rains 0
Rains 0%
0 % low-access
FARA 2019 · elevated low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 9 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 33,915 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 5 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 2 |
| Low-Access Population | 12,514 |
| Low-Access Share | 36.9%well above the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 4,408 |
Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 37,326 |
| Median Household Income | $72,295 |
| Poverty Rate | 13.7%near the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,314 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 10.3%below the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 3.4%well below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 8.1% |
Thick SNAP store book in Fannin County
Fannin County has 30 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 7 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 13 locations (43% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 13
- bonham's fuel & food stop, bonham
- eastside grocery, ladonia
- ector food mart, ector
- kwik chek 1, bonham
- kwik chek 10, bonham
- kwik chek 17, trenton
- kwik chek 27, honey grove
- kwik chek 3, bonham
- kwik chek 6, bonham
- kwik chek 8, leonard
- murphy usa 7917, bonham
- quick stop food store, savoy
- txb 5, bonham
Combination Grocery/Other · 11
- braum's 110, bonham
- dollar general 14711, bonham
- dollar general 2653, bonham
- dollar general 10140, leonard
- dollar general 16611, trenton
- dollar general 22764, ladonia
- dollar general 25438, ravenna
- dollar general 8434, honey grove
- dollar tree 6837, leonard
- dollar tree 7076, bonham
- family dollar 4326, bonham
Supermarket · 2
- brookshire food store 54, bonham
- spring market 716, leonard
Fruits/Veg Specialty · 1
- fresh produce and more, honey grove
Meat/Poultry Specialty · 1
- yaman halal meat, savoy
Small Grocery Store · 1
- el corral meat market inc, bonham
Super Store · 1
- walmart supercenter 158, bonham
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Texas
One of 253 counties in Texas, 6 are shown here.
Compare Fannin County vs Anderson County → · All Texas counties →
Counties near Fannin County's elevated low-access or SNAP band
Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Fannin County, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not the same-state county list above.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside TX (36.9% here).
- Henry County, MO · 36.9% low-access
- Henry County, MO · 36.9% low-access
- Geary County, KS · 36.9% low-access
- Geary County, KS · 36.9% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside TX (10.3% here).
- Shenandoah County, VA · 10.3% SNAP
- Shenandoah County, VA · 10.3% SNAP
- Northampton County, PA · 10.3% SNAP
- Northampton County, PA · 10.3% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Fannin County inside a higher low-access state context
Fannin County sits inside Texas (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Fannin County, TX are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 48147. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.