Signature · 28 SNAP-authorized stores
Moore County, TX
Moore County's food-access picture is close to the national norm, with pockets that qualify as low-access. This profile breaks down who qualifies as a food desert and the income, SNAP, and vehicle-access context behind it.
- 17.8%
- low-access pop.
- 1
- food-desert tracts
- 8.6%
- on SNAP
- 21K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Moore County, TX
LA-MODERATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-SINGLE · SNAP-LIGHT · VEH-OK · DENSITY-DENSE
- LA-MODERATE 17.8% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -4.3 pts vs US
- LILA-SINGLE 1 food-desert tract
- SNAP-LIGHT 8.6% SNAP
- VEH-OK 6.7% no vehicle
- DENSITY-DENSE 25% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Shelby County (+ 0.1 pts)
The food-access picture
According to the USDA Food Access Research Atlas, Moore County ranks #1,882 of 3,079 U.S. counties by low-access share and #182 of 252 counties in TX (17.8% low-access; 1 food-desert tracts).
- #1,882
- national by low-access %
- #182
- in TX
- 2
- low-access tracts
- 2K
- food-desert residents
Low access = living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket. Food deserts add a low-income condition (USDA LILA).
Signature read: 28 SNAP-authorized stores .
How Moore County compares nationally
Moore County lands in the middle of the national distribution: a 17.8% low-access share that beats 40% of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data (rank #1,885).
Moore County: USDA Food-Access Tier Breakdown
4 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 1 LILA.
By USDA urbanicity classification, Moore County has 2 urban and 2 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Moore County low-access neighbourhood
Poles + nearest peers in Texas, not a full county-board reprint
- Throckmorton
Throckmorton 100%
100 % low-access
- Shelby 17.9
Shelby 17.9%
17.9 % low-access
- Moore 17.8
Moore 17.8%
17.8 % low-access
- Brooks 17.7
Brooks 17.7%
17.7 % low-access
- Carson 17.6
Carson 17.6%
17.6 % low-access
- Waller 17.6
Waller 17.6%
17.6 % low-access
- Rains 0
Rains 0%
0 % low-access
Food Access (USDA FARA 2019)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 4 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 21,904 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 2 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 1 |
| Low-Access Population | 3,898 |
| Low-Access Share | 17.8%below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 1,878 |
ACS 2024 · lower SNAP band
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 21,373 |
| Median Household Income | $61,762 |
| Poverty Rate | 18.3%above the national average |
| SNAP Households | 616 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 8.6%below the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 6.7%below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 0.7% |
Thick SNAP store book in Moore County
Moore County has 28 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 6 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 14 locations (50% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 14
- allsups 088, sunray
- allsups 099, dumas
- allsups 163, dumas
- allsups 164, dumas
- carniceria el chuleton, dumas
- dumas food stop, dumas
- loves travel stop 626, dumas
- murphy usa 7036, dumas
- pak-a-sak 3, dumas
- pak-a-sak 6, dumas
- toot'n totum 107, dumas
- toot'n totum 109, dumas
- toot'n totum 117, sunray
- united express 542, dumas
Combination Grocery/Other · 8
- braum's 188, dumas
- cvs/ pharmacy inc 4820, dumas
- dollar general 1849, dumas
- dollar tree 3872, dumas
- family dollar 11304, cactus
- family dollar 2819, dumas
- family dollar 8928, sunray
- golden lotus market, dumas
Small Grocery Store · 2
- golden lotus cactus, cactus
- latin market cuban food, llc, dumas
Supermarket · 2
- lowes 67, dumas
- united supermarket 542, dumas
Medium Grocery Store · 1
- carniceria and restuarant los potrillos, dumas
Super Store · 1
- walmart supercenter 812, dumas
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Texas
One of 253 counties in Texas, 6 are shown here.
Compare Moore County vs Anderson County → · All Texas counties →
Nationwide peers for Moore County's low-access or SNAP share
Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Moore County, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not the same-state county list above.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside TX (17.8% here).
- Prince Edward County, VA · 17.8% low-access
- Prince Edward County, VA · 17.8% low-access
- Florence County, SC · 17.8% low-access
- Florence County, SC · 17.8% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside TX (8.6% here).
- Washington County, TN · 8.6% SNAP
- Washington County, TN · 8.6% SNAP
- Lincoln County, TN · 8.6% SNAP
- Lincoln County, TN · 8.6% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Food access nationally, Texas in context
Moore County sits inside Texas (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Moore County, TX are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 48341. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.