County food-access profile · Montana

Richland County, MT

Richland County sits among the counties with the widest food-access gaps the USDA tracks, most residents here live well outside a comfortable walk or drive to a supermarket. This profile covers who qualifies as a food desert and the income, SNAP, and vehicle-access context behind it.

53.8%
low-access pop.
0
food-desert tracts
4.4%
on SNAP
11K
residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA 2019 Census ACS 2024 MT

The food-access picture

53.8% of Richland County residents live in a low-access area, though none of its tracts meet the USDA food-desert threshold.

4
low-access tracts
1K
food-desert residents
5.1%
households, no vehicle
6.6%
below poverty line

Low access = living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket. Food deserts add a low-income condition (USDA LILA, 1-and-10-mile measure).

Richland County carries one of the more serious food-access burdens the USDA Atlas tracks: its low-access share of 53.8% is well above the national share. 4 of the county's 4 census tracts fall into that category, areas where residents live far from a supermarket, covering about 5,248 people. None of them meet the low-income condition that would additionally classify them as food deserts.

How the USDA defines low-access and food-desert tracts

The USDA measures food access by distance to the nearest supermarket. A census tract is "low-access" when a meaningful share of residents live more than one mile from a supermarket in urban areas, or more than ten miles in rural areas. A tract becomes a "food desert" only when it is both low-access and low-income, because distance is far harder to overcome for households without a car or a cushion in the budget. Counts on this page are aggregated from the tract level, where the federal data is actually published, so a single county figure can hide neighbourhoods that are much better or much worse served than the average. Distance also does not capture everything that shapes whether a family eats well: the presence of a full-service grocer rather than a convenience store, public transit, food pantries, and the price and quality of what is on the shelf all matter beyond the radius the Atlas can draw.

How Richland County compares nationally

Richland County sits among the nation's most food-access-constrained counties: its 53.8% low-access share outpaces 95% of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data, ranking #165 most-affected nationwide.

lower low-accesshigher low-access

Richland County: USDA Food-Access Tier Breakdown

All 4 census tracts in Richland County, grouped by USDA classification (see "How the USDA defines low-access and food-desert tracts" above for what each tier means).

Food access tier distribution for Richland County, MT USDA-defined food-access tiers: 0 census tracts adequate (within distance threshold), 4 limited, 0 severe (low-income low-access food desert). Total 4 tracts evaluated. 4 tracts limited (100.0%) Adequate 0% Limited 100% Severe 0% Food-access tier distribution: Richland County, MT
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas 2019

Richland County vs. other Montana counties

Share of the population living in low-access areas, compared with other counties in Montana

% low-access
Source USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas As of 2019 edition

Food Access (USDA FARA 2019)

USDA Food Access Research Atlas 2019 indicators for Richland County
IndicatorValue
Census Tracts4
Atlas Population (2010 basis)9,746
Low-Access Tracts4
Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access)0
Low-Access Population5,248
Low-Access Share53.8%well above the national average
Low-Income & Low-Access Population1,129

Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)

Census ACS 2024 demographic and SNAP data for Richland County
IndicatorValue
Population11,235
Median Household Income$73,084
Poverty Rate6.6%well below the national average
SNAP Households193
SNAP Participation Rate4.4%well below the national average
Households Without a Vehicle5.1%below the national average
Group-Quarters Population0.5%
SNAP participation in Richland County 4.4%

About 4.4% of Richland County households receive SNAP, versus a U.S. county median in the 11–13% range (Census ACS).

What this means

  • 53.8% of residents are low-access, well above the national share for U.S. counties.
  • 4.4% of households receive SNAP, the federal program that offsets food costs for 193 households here.
  • 5.1% of households have no vehicle, the hidden multiplier that turns distance into a real barrier.
  • Median household income is $73,084 with a 6.6% poverty rate.

USDA low-access figures reflect the 2019 Atlas (2010 tract populations); socioeconomic context is the latest Census ACS 5-year (2024).

What the food-access data shows for Richland County

well above the national share

A further 4 tracts are low-access but not low-income, bringing the total low-access tract count to 4.

An estimated 5,248 residents, roughly 53.8% of the county's 2010 population, live in one of these low-access areas.

Of those, 1,129 are also low-income, the group most exposed to genuine food hardship, since limited transportation compounds a limited budget.

SNAP retailers in Richland County

Richland County has 12 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 5 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 6 locations (50% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.

Convenience Store · 6

  • brake time #251716, sidney
  • brake time 251717, fairview
  • superpumper 80123, sidney
  • tjs quik stop, poplar
  • town pump of sidney 8310, sidney
  • tribal express, poplar

Combination Grocery/Other · 3

  • dollar general 25534, sidney
  • family dollar 12433, sidney
  • family dollar 13335, poplar

Large Grocery Store · 1

  • neu's supervalu, fairview

Super Store · 1

  • reynolds market 16923, sidney

Supermarket · 1

  • the market at sidney, sidney

Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator, currently authorized retailers.

Other Counties in Montana

Compare Richland County vs Beaverhead County → · All Montana counties →

Food access nationally, Montana in context

Richland County sits inside Montana (ringed). Each state is colored by its population-weighted low-access share; click any state to compare.

USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context

Understand the Data

Frequently Asked Questions

What share of Richland County has low food access?
53.8% of residents in Richland County, MT live in low-access areas, more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket, per the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019).
What is the SNAP participation rate in Richland County?
4.4% of households in Richland County receive SNAP, covering 193 households (Census ACS 2024 5-year estimates).
What is the poverty rate in Richland County?
The poverty rate in Richland County, MT is 6.6%, with a median household income of $73,084 (Census ACS 2024).
Is Richland County a food desert?
0 of Richland County's 4 census tracts meet the USDA food-desert threshold (low-income and low-access). No tracts here meet both conditions in the 2019 Atlas.
What share of Richland County households lack a vehicle?
5.1% of households in Richland County have no vehicle available (Census ACS 2024), which compounds any distance to a supermarket.
Data Sources & Methodology

USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019): low-access and food-desert tract classifications, low-access population, and low-income low-access counts. ers.usda.gov/food-access-research-atlas

U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates: population, median income, poverty, SNAP participation, vehicle access, and group quarters. census.gov/programs-surveys/acs

Low access is defined as living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket; a food desert adds a low-income condition. Read the full methodology →

Data current as of (most recent source-data vintage; figures reflect the 2019 USDA Atlas and 2024 Census ACS).

Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.