Signature · 2.3% low-access (6th pct)
Charles City County, VA
Charles City County lands in the lower national band on low-access (2.3%); supermarket distance is less binding than in the upper band, though local tracts can still diverge.
- 2.3%
- low-access pop.
- 0
- food-desert tracts
- 10.6%
- on SNAP
- 7K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Charles City County, VA
LA-ADEQUATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-NONE · SNAP-LIGHT · VEH-OK · DENSITY-CLEAR
- LA-ADEQUATE 2.3% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -19.8 pts vs US
- LILA-NONE 0 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-LIGHT 10.6% SNAP
- VEH-OK 5.9% no vehicle
- DENSITY-CLEAR 0% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Arlington County (+ 0.0 pts)
Lower-band low-access
Charles City County lands in the lower national band (2.3%, #2,946 of 3,079); local tracts can still diverge from the county mean.
- #2,946
- national by low-access %
- #113
- in VA
- 0
- low-access tracts
- 52
- food-desert residents
Lower-band county means still leave tract outliers on the table below.
Signature read: 2.3% low-access (6th pct) (-19.8 pts vs U.S. low-access).
How Charles City County compares nationally
Food access in Charles City County compares favorably nationally: its 2.3% low-access share is lower than the vast majority of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data, higher than only 6% of them (rank #2,949).
Charles City County's lower-band USDA tier split
3 census tracts grouped by USDA classification .
By USDA urbanicity classification, Charles City County has 0 urban and 3 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Charles City County vs nearby low low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Virginia, not a full county-board reprint
- Highland
Highland 99.7%
99.7 % low-access
- Charles City 2.3
Charles City 2.3%
2.3 % low-access
- Arlington 2.3
Arlington 2.3%
2.3 % low-access
- Louisa 2.3
Louisa 2.3%
2.3 % low-access
- Accomack 2.2
Accomack 2.2%
2.2 % low-access
- Staunton city 2.2
Staunton city 2.2%
2.2 % low-access
- Dickenson 0
Dickenson 0%
0 % low-access
FARA 2019 · lower low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 3 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 7,256 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 0 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 0 |
| Low-Access Population | 167 |
| Low-Access Share | 2.3%well below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 52 |
Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 6,627 |
| Median Household Income | $75,417 |
| Poverty Rate | 9.4%below the national average |
| SNAP Households | 309 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 10.6%below the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 5.9%below the national average |
Other Counties in Virginia
One of 132 counties in Virginia, 6 are shown here.
Compare Charles City County vs Accomack County → · All Virginia counties →
Charles City County inside a lower low-access state context
Charles City County sits inside Virginia (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Charles City County, VA are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 51036. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.