County food-access profile · Nebraska

Richardson County, NE

Distance to a supermarket is a real obstacle for a meaningful share of Richardson County residents. This profile covers who qualifies as a food desert here and the income, SNAP, and vehicle-access context behind it, from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and the Census ACS (2024).

30.7%
low-access pop.
0
food-desert tracts
7.5%
on SNAP
8K
residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA 2019 Census ACS 2024 NE

The food-access picture

30.7% of Richardson County residents live in a low-access area, though none of its tracts meet the USDA food-desert threshold.

2
low-access tracts
813
food-desert residents
8.0%
households, no vehicle
10.5%
below poverty line

Low access = living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket. Food deserts add a low-income condition (USDA LILA, 1-and-10-mile measure).

USDA data puts Richardson County's low-access share at 30.7%, above the national share. 2 of the county's 3 census tracts are classified low-access, meaning residents there live far from a supermarket, an area covering about 2,565 people. None of them meet the low-income condition that would additionally classify them as food deserts.

How the USDA defines low-access and food-desert tracts

The USDA measures food access by distance to the nearest supermarket. A census tract is "low-access" when a meaningful share of residents live more than one mile from a supermarket in urban areas, or more than ten miles in rural areas. A tract becomes a "food desert" only when it is both low-access and low-income, because distance is far harder to overcome for households without a car or a cushion in the budget. Counts on this page are aggregated from the tract level, where the federal data is actually published, so a single county figure can hide neighbourhoods that are much better or much worse served than the average. Distance also does not capture everything that shapes whether a family eats well: the presence of a full-service grocer rather than a convenience store, public transit, food pantries, and the price and quality of what is on the shelf all matter beyond the radius the Atlas can draw.

How Richardson County compares nationally

Relative to the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA food-access data, Richardson County's 30.7% low-access share is elevated, higher than 71% of them and ranked #896 most-affected nationwide.

lower low-accesshigher low-access

Richardson County: USDA Food-Access Tier Breakdown

All 3 census tracts in Richardson County, grouped by USDA classification (see "How the USDA defines low-access and food-desert tracts" above for what each tier means).

Food access tier distribution for Richardson County, NE USDA-defined food-access tiers: 1 census tracts adequate (within distance threshold), 2 limited, 0 severe (low-income low-access food desert). Total 3 tracts evaluated. 1 tracts adequate (33.3%) 2 tracts limited (66.7%) Adequate 33% Limited 67% Severe 0% Food-access tier distribution: Richardson County, NE
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas 2019

Richardson County vs. other Nebraska counties

Share of the population living in low-access areas, compared with other counties in Nebraska

% low-access
Source USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas As of 2019 edition

Food Access (USDA FARA 2019)

USDA Food Access Research Atlas 2019 indicators for Richardson County
IndicatorValue
Census Tracts3
Atlas Population (2010 basis)8,363
Low-Access Tracts2
Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access)0
Low-Access Population2,565
Low-Access Share30.7%above the national average
Low-Income & Low-Access Population813

Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)

Census ACS 2024 demographic and SNAP data for Richardson County
IndicatorValue
Population7,751
Median Household Income$60,108
Poverty Rate10.5%below the national average
SNAP Households268
SNAP Participation Rate7.5%below the national average
Households Without a Vehicle8.0%near the national average
Group-Quarters Population1.8%
SNAP participation in Richardson County 7.5%

About 7.5% of Richardson County households receive SNAP, versus a U.S. county median in the 11–13% range (Census ACS).

What this means

  • 30.7% of residents are low-access, above the national share for U.S. counties.
  • 7.5% of households receive SNAP, the federal program that offsets food costs for 268 households here.
  • 8.0% of households have no vehicle, the hidden multiplier that turns distance into a real barrier.
  • Median household income is $60,108 with a 10.5% poverty rate.

USDA low-access figures reflect the 2019 Atlas (2010 tract populations); socioeconomic context is the latest Census ACS 5-year (2024).

What the food-access data shows for Richardson County

above the national share

A further 2 tracts are low-access but not low-income, bringing the total low-access tract count to 2.

An estimated 2,565 residents, roughly 30.7% of the county's 2010 population, live in one of these low-access areas.

Of those, 813 are also low-income, the group most exposed to genuine food hardship, since limited transportation compounds a limited budget.

The remaining 1 tract (33.3%) meet the USDA's adequate-access threshold.

SNAP retailers in Richardson County

Richardson County has 8 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 5 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 3 locations (38% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.

Convenience Store · 3

  • casey's general store 1790, falls city
  • kwik shop 350648, falls city
  • pump & pantry 55, falls city

Combination Grocery/Other · 2

  • dollar general 18639, humboldt
  • dollar general 2745, falls city

Medium Grocery Store · 1

  • niders grocery, humboldt

Super Store · 1

  • falls city dollar fresh 1181, falls city

Supermarket · 1

  • family fare 3734, falls city

Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator, currently authorized retailers.

Other Counties in Nebraska

Compare Richardson County vs Adams County → · All Nebraska counties →

Food access nationally, Nebraska in context

Richardson County sits inside Nebraska (ringed). Each state is colored by its population-weighted low-access share; click any state to compare.

USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context

Understand the Data

Frequently Asked Questions

What share of Richardson County has low food access?
30.7% of residents in Richardson County, NE live in low-access areas, more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket, per the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019).
What is the SNAP participation rate in Richardson County?
7.5% of households in Richardson County receive SNAP, covering 268 households (Census ACS 2024 5-year estimates).
What is the poverty rate in Richardson County?
The poverty rate in Richardson County, NE is 10.5%, with a median household income of $60,108 (Census ACS 2024).
Is Richardson County a food desert?
0 of Richardson County's 3 census tracts meet the USDA food-desert threshold (low-income and low-access). No tracts here meet both conditions in the 2019 Atlas.
What share of Richardson County households lack a vehicle?
8.0% of households in Richardson County have no vehicle available (Census ACS 2024), which compounds any distance to a supermarket.
Data Sources & Methodology

USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019): low-access and food-desert tract classifications, low-access population, and low-income low-access counts. ers.usda.gov/food-access-research-atlas

U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates: population, median income, poverty, SNAP participation, vehicle access, and group quarters. census.gov/programs-surveys/acs

Low access is defined as living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket; a food desert adds a low-income condition. Read the full methodology →

Data current as of (most recent source-data vintage; figures reflect the 2019 USDA Atlas and 2024 Census ACS).

Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.