Signature · 11.6% SNAP (93rd pct in NE)
Lincoln County, NE
Lincoln County stands out on SNAP (11.6%, -0.5 pts vs U.S.) with 14.4% low-access from USDA FARA 2019.
- 14.4%
- low-access pop.
- 0
- food-desert tracts
- 11.6%
- on SNAP
- 34K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Lincoln County, NE
LA-MODERATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-NONE · SNAP-TYPICAL · VEH-OK · DENSITY-CLEAR
- LA-MODERATE 14.4% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -7.7 pts vs US
- LILA-NONE 0 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-TYPICAL 11.6% SNAP
- VEH-OK 4.1% no vehicle
- DENSITY-CLEAR 0% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Logan County ( -0.4 pts)
Lower-band low-access
Lincoln County lands in the lower national band (14.4%, #2,162 of 3,079); local tracts can still diverge from the county mean.
- #2,162
- national by low-access %
- #74
- in NE
- 3
- low-access tracts
- 1K
- food-desert residents
Lower-band county means still leave tract outliers on the table below.
Signature read: 11.6% SNAP (93rd pct in NE) (-0.5 pts vs U.S. SNAP) .
How Lincoln County compares nationally
Lincoln County lands in the middle of the national distribution: a 14.4% low-access share that beats 31% of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data (rank #2,165).
Lincoln County's lower-band USDA tier split
8 census tracts grouped by USDA classification .
By USDA urbanicity classification, Lincoln County has 4 urban and 4 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Lincoln County vs nearby low low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Nebraska, not a full county-board reprint
- Thomas
Thomas 100%
100 % low-access
- Dakota 16.2
Dakota 16.2%
16.2 % low-access
- Butler 15.5
Butler 15.5%
15.5 % low-access
- Lincoln 14.4
Lincoln 14.4%
14.4 % low-access
- Logan 14
Logan 14%
14 % low-access
- Antelope 12.9
Antelope 12.9%
12.9 % low-access
- Burt 0.7
Burt 0.7%
0.7 % low-access
FARA 2019 · lower low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 8 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 36,288 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 3 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 0 |
| Low-Access Population | 5,209 |
| Low-Access Share | 14.4%below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 1,138 |
ACS 2024 · elevated SNAP band
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 33,802 |
| Median Household Income | $65,148 |
| Poverty Rate | 12.4%below the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,730 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 11.6%near the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 4.1%well below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 2.0% |
Thick SNAP store book in Lincoln County
Lincoln County has 29 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 6 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 17 locations (59% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 17
- casey's general store 1759, north platte
- casey's general store 1914, north platte
- casey's general store 2163, north platte
- fast stop 1151 inc., hershey
- fast stop 1155, sutherland
- fast stop 1159, sutherland
- kwik stop 04, north platte
- kwik stop 05, north platte
- kwik stop 07, north platte
- kwik stop 1, north platte
- kwik stop 16, hershey
- kwik stop 2, north platte
- kwik stop 3, north platte
- loves travel stop 390, north platte
- natural nutrition house, north platte
- pilot travel center 687, north platte
- pump & pantry 39, north platte
Combination Grocery/Other · 5
- dollar general 15980, sutherland
- dollar general 9509, north platte
- dollar tree 2394, north platte
- family dollar 5173, north platte
- walgreens 12405, north platte
Super Store · 3
- fresh foods 8, north platte
- fresh foods 9, north platte
- walmart sc 1585, north platte
Large Grocery Store · 2
- macs super foods, wallace
- maline's superfoods 9431, sutherland
Bakery Specialty · 1
- papa murphy's pizza ne036, north platte
Medium Grocery Store · 1
- hershey super foods, hershey
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Nebraska
One of 92 counties in Nebraska, 6 are shown here.
Compare Lincoln County vs Adams County → · All Nebraska counties →
Counties near Lincoln County's lower low-access or SNAP band
SNAP-led peer set first for Lincoln County (11.6%), with low-access neighbours deduped against it, both outside Nebraska.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside NE (14.4% here).
- Chautauqua County, NY · 14.4% low-access
- Chautauqua County, NY · 14.4% low-access
- Bladen County, NC · 14.4% low-access
- Bladen County, NC · 14.4% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside NE (11.6% here).
- Cass County, MN · 11.6% SNAP
- Cass County, MN · 11.6% SNAP
- Becker County, MN · 11.6% SNAP
- Becker County, MN · 11.6% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Lincoln County inside a lower low-access state context
Lincoln County sits inside Nebraska (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Lincoln County, NE are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 31111. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.