Signature · 39.9% low-access (87th pct)
Loup County, NE
Loup County sits in the upper national band on low-access (39.9%, +17.8 pts vs U.S.), with SNAP/vehicle context from ACS 2024.
- 39.9%
- low-access pop.
- 0
- food-desert tracts
- 6.1%
- on SNAP
- 578
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Loup County, NE
LA-ELEVATED · ABOVE-NATIONAL · LILA-NONE · SNAP-LIGHT · VEH-OK · DENSITY-CLEAR
- LA-ELEVATED 39.9% low-access
- ABOVE-NATIONAL +17.8 pts vs US
- LILA-NONE 0 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-LIGHT 6.1% SNAP
- VEH-OK 1.6% no vehicle
- DENSITY-CLEAR 0% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Cherry County ( -1.1 pts)
Upper-band low-access
Loup County sits in the upper national band (39.9%, #400 of 3,079).
- #400
- national by low-access %
- #23
- in NE
- 1
- low-access tracts
- 75
- food-desert residents
Upper-band counties often pair elevated low-access with clustered LILA tracts. Low access = >1 mile urban / >10 miles rural.
Signature read: 39.9% low-access (87th pct) (+17.8 pts vs U.S. low-access).
How Loup County compares nationally
Relative to the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA food-access data, Loup County's 39.9% low-access share is elevated, higher than 87% of them and ranked #400 most-affected nationwide.
Loup County's elevated USDA tier split
1 census tracts grouped by USDA classification .
All 1 of Loup County's tracts are rural in the USDA classification, so every one is judged on the 10-mile test: a resident counts as low-access only when the nearest supermarket is more than 10 miles away.
Loup County vs nearby high low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Nebraska, not a full county-board reprint
- Thomas
Thomas 100%
100 % low-access
- Dawson
Dawson 41.3%
41.3 % low-access
- Grant
Grant 41%
41 % low-access
- Loup 39.9
Loup 39.9%
39.9 % low-access
- Cherry 38.8
Cherry 38.8%
38.8 % low-access
- Garden 37.9
Garden 37.9%
37.9 % low-access
- Burt 0.7
Burt 0.7%
0.7 % low-access
FARA 2019 · elevated low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 1 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 632 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 1 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 0 |
| Low-Access Population | 252 |
| Low-Access Share | 39.9%well above the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 75 |
Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 578 |
| Median Household Income | $71,667 |
| Poverty Rate | 6.9%well below the national average |
| SNAP Households | 15 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 6.1%well below the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 1.6%well below the national average |
Other Counties in Nebraska
One of 92 counties in Nebraska, 6 are shown here.
Compare Loup County vs Adams County → · All Nebraska counties →
Nebraska among West North Central states
Nebraska ranks 6th of 7 West North Central states by population-weighted low-access (21.9%). Loup County, at 39.9%, runs 18.0 pts above the Nebraska rate.
- South Dakota 29.1%
- North Dakota 28.9%
- Minnesota 27.4%
- Kansas 26.4%
- Missouri 24.9%
- Nebraska 21.9%
- Iowa 20.0%
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted by state; divisions per the U.S. Census Bureau. National state map
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Loup County, NE are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 31115. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.