Signature · 0.2% low-access (2nd pct)
Amador County, CA
Amador County lands in the lower national band on low-access (0.2%); supermarket distance is less binding than in the upper band, though local tracts can still diverge.
- 0.2%
- low-access pop.
- 0
- food-desert tracts
- 9.8%
- on SNAP
- 41K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Amador County, CA
LA-ADEQUATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-NONE · SNAP-LIGHT · VEH-OK · DENSITY-CLEAR
- LA-ADEQUATE 0.2% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -21.9 pts vs US
- LILA-NONE 0 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-LIGHT 9.8% SNAP
- VEH-OK 4.0% no vehicle
- DENSITY-CLEAR 0% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: San Francisco County (+ 0.4 pts)
Lower-band low-access
Amador County lands in the lower national band (0.2%, #3,062 of 3,079); local tracts can still diverge from the county mean.
- #3,062
- national by low-access %
- #58
- in CA
- 0
- low-access tracts
- 36
- food-desert residents
Lower-band county means still leave tract outliers on the table below.
Signature read: 0.2% low-access (2nd pct) (-21.9 pts vs U.S. low-access).
How Amador County compares nationally
Food access in Amador County compares favorably nationally: its 0.2% low-access share is lower than the vast majority of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data, higher than only 2% of them (rank #3,067).
Amador County's lower-band USDA tier split
9 census tracts grouped by USDA classification .
By USDA urbanicity classification, Amador County has 0 urban and 9 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Amador County vs nearby low low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in California, not a full county-board reprint
- Sierra
Sierra 88.2%
88.2 % low-access
- Los Angeles 6.5
Los Angeles 6.5%
6.5 % low-access
- Plumas 6.3
Plumas 6.3%
6.3 % low-access
- Lake 4.2
Lake 4.2%
4.2 % low-access
- San Francisco 0.6
San Francisco 0.6%
0.6 % low-access
- Amador 0.2
Amador 0.2%
0.2 % low-access
FARA 2019 · lower low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 9 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 38,091 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 0 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 0 |
| Low-Access Population | 66 |
| Low-Access Share | 0.2%well below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 36 |
ACS 2024 · lower SNAP band
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 41,428 |
| Median Household Income | $88,044 |
| Poverty Rate | 8.2%well below the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,575 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 9.8%below the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 4.0%well below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 8.7% |
Thick SNAP store book in Amador County
Amador County has 28 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 7 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 9 locations (32% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 9
- buena vista store, ione
- camanche blues store 1, ione
- day & night food mart, sutter creek
- ione trading post, ione
- jackson am pm 83826, jackson
- jon's pit stop, jackson
- pine grove stage shop, pine grove
- red corral mini mart, pioneer
- sutter creek trading post, sutter creek
Combination Grocery/Other · 6
- cvs pharmacy 9233, jackson
- dollar general 15506, pine grove
- dollar general 25955, pioneer
- dollar tree 1735, jackson
- ione plaza market, ione
- walgreens 12528, sutter creek
Super Store · 4
- cost less food company #8-jackson, jackson
- jackson grocery outlet 37, jackson
- payless market, pioneer
- walmart 2054, jackson
Supermarket · 4
- pokerville market, plymouth
- raley's 426, jackson
- safeway 2778, jackson
- save mart 609, jackson
Bakery Specialty · 3
- papa murphy 174, jackson
- ray's pizza, pioneer
- ray's pizza jackson, jackson
Large Grocery Store · 1
- orlando's pine grove, pine grove
Medium Grocery Store · 1
- gold trail natural foods, jackson
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in California
One of 57 counties in California, 6 are shown here.
Compare Amador County vs Alameda County → · All California counties →
Counties near Amador County's lower low-access or SNAP band
Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Amador County, both outside California so the neighborhoods are not the same-state county list above.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside CA (0.2% here).
- Antrim County, MI · 0.2% low-access
- Antrim County, MI · 0.2% low-access
- Marion County, SC · 0.2% low-access
- Marion County, SC · 0.2% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside CA (9.8% here).
- Howard County, AR · 9.8% SNAP
- Howard County, AR · 9.8% SNAP
- New Castle County, DE · 9.8% SNAP
- New Castle County, DE · 9.8% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Amador County inside a lower low-access state context
Amador County sits inside California (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Amador County, CA are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 06005. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.