Signature · 339 LILA tracts (4.08/county)

Food access in Michigan

How far Michigan residents live from a supermarket (23.2% low-access), where LILA tracts sit, and SNAP/vehicle context from USDA FARA 2019 + Census ACS 2024.

23.2%
low-access pop.
339
food-desert tracts
13.5%
on SNAP
83
counties

USDA FARA state access plate

State MI · Michigan

LA-ELEVATED · ABOVE-NATIONAL · LILA-CLUSTER · SNAP-TYPICAL · VEH-OK · BOOK-MID

  • LA-ELEVATED 23.2% low-access
  • ABOVE-NATIONAL +1.1 pts vs US
  • LILA-CLUSTER 339 food-desert tracts
  • SNAP-TYPICAL 13.5% SNAP
  • VEH-OK 7.0% no vehicle
  • BOOK-MID 83 counties

Nearest low-access peer: Washington ( -0.1 pts)

Michigan's thick county book (83)

Michigan covers 83 counties among 51 states and DC (atlas inventory, not a food-access quality ranking). Orthogonal to the low-access / SNAP charts below.

Michigan vs all states by county count

Where this state's county inventory sits among every tracked jurisdiction

83 15th of 51 higher than 36 of 51 states

Jurisdictions, banded by county inventory

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USDA Food Access Research Atlas / Census county inventory · 2026-06-23

Mid-band statewide picture

About 2.3M Michigan residents (23.2%) live low-access - #30 of 50, with 339 USDA food-desert tracts.

#30
among states by low-access
2.3M
low-access residents
630K
food-desert residents
7.0%
households, no vehicle

Population-weighted tract shares. Low access = >1 mile urban / >10 miles rural from a supermarket.

Where Michigan sits on low-access

Michigan ringed at #30 of 50 by population-weighted low-access. Click any state to compare.

USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context

Signature read: 339 LILA tracts (4.08/county) .

Michigan is in the middle third nationally on low-access (23.2% , #30 of 50). SNAP averages 13.5% of households (upper SNAP band) and 7.0% have no vehicle , with 339 LILA tracts. County pressure peaks in Schoolcraft County at 46.0%.

Nationwide peers for Michigan's low-access or SNAP share

Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Michigan. Neighbourhood chart below is local poles; these panels are full-corpus nearest neighbours excluding this state.

Similar low-access share

Nearest population-weighted low-access rates (23.2% here).

Similar SNAP participation

Nearest household SNAP rates (13.5% here), deduped against the low-access panel.

Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Floor county_count ≥ 5.

Michigan low-access neighbourhood

Poles + nearest state peers, not a full national reprint

% low-access
Source USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas As of 2019 edition

Highest low-access counties in Michigan

Schoolcraft County ~0.2% of statewide low-access residents

% low-access
Source USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas As of 2019 edition

All counties in Michigan

CountyLow-accessSNAP
Schoolcraft County46.0%11.8%
Muskegon County43.0%19.4%
Gratiot County39.6%15.1%
Ingham County38.0%12.1%
Genesee County35.9%18.8%
St. Clair County35.7%13.3%
Otsego County35.2%10.5%
Mackinac County34.6%11.9%
Ontonagon County34.2%11.3%
Clinton County34.1%6.6%
Ottawa County31.4%6.0%
Eaton County30.9%10.1%
Jackson County30.4%13.7%
Kalamazoo County30.3%11.2%
Oakland County30.2%7.7%
Saginaw County30.1%19.6%
Keweenaw County29.2%7.4%
Calhoun County29.1%13.5%
Livingston County28.9%4.8%
Lenawee County28.8%11.1%
Luce County28.5%14.4%
Ionia County27.3%13.6%
Macomb County27.3%12.8%
Shiawassee County27.3%15.0%
Dickinson County25.7%8.3%
Mason County25.7%12.9%
Berrien County25.2%14.2%
Washtenaw County25.2%8.5%
Wexford County24.8%16.9%
Emmet County23.6%7.4%
Presque Isle County23.2%10.6%
Mecosta County22.9%14.4%
Huron County21.1%11.3%
Allegan County20.8%7.8%
Kent County20.3%10.3%
Chippewa County19.8%13.1%
Midland County19.4%11.7%
Marquette County17.1%9.6%
Grand Traverse County17.0%7.5%
Alpena County15.9%16.7%
Menominee County15.9%10.1%
Monroe County15.9%10.0%
Alcona County15.6%12.5%
Baraga County15.4%16.2%
Delta County15.3%12.4%
Tuscola County15.3%14.2%
St. Joseph County15.2%14.8%
Gogebic County15.1%18.6%
Wayne County14.8%23.0%
Sanilac County14.3%12.6%
Iron County14.0%13.3%
Branch County13.6%12.8%
Cass County13.3%12.8%
Roscommon County13.3%16.8%
Gladwin County13.1%16.2%
Bay County12.9%13.6%
Iosco County12.9%14.8%
Alger County12.8%11.0%
Houghton County10.5%9.7%
Manistee County9.6%12.1%
Cheboygan County9.4%12.6%
Oceana County9.3%15.9%
Isabella County9.2%11.4%
Lapeer County7.5%11.4%
Crawford County6.4%14.8%
Leelanau County5.7%4.7%
Hillsdale County5.4%12.0%
Van Buren County4.9%13.7%
Kalkaska County4.6%15.6%
Missaukee County4.3%12.9%
Newaygo County4.3%16.6%
Montmorency County3.9%16.8%
Clare County2.7%19.0%
Montcalm County2.5%12.8%
Oscoda County1.6%16.3%
Charlevoix County1.4%8.0%
Lake County1.4%19.1%
Antrim County0.2%10.0%
Ogemaw County0.1%18.3%
Osceola County0.1%15.1%
Arenac County0.0%16.1%
Barry County0.0%9.4%
Benzie County0.0%7.8%

Source: USDA ERS Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + U.S. Census Bureau ACS (2024 5-year). Sorted by low-access share, highest first.

Figures from USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and Census ACS 2024 5-year. Compiled . Methodology · All states.

PlainFoodAccess renders this state summary directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Statewide figures for Michigan are population-weighted aggregates of county Atlas and ACS records. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.