Signature · 339 LILA tracts (4.08/county)

Food access in Michigan

How far Michigan residents live from a supermarket (23.2% low-access), where LILA tracts sit, and SNAP/vehicle context from USDA FARA 2019 + Census ACS 2024.

23.2%
low-access pop.
339
food-desert tracts
13.5%
on SNAP
83
counties

USDA FARA state access plate

State MI · Michigan

LA-ELEVATED · ABOVE-NATIONAL · LILA-CLUSTER · SNAP-TYPICAL · VEH-OK · BOOK-MID

  • LA-ELEVATED 23.2% low-access
  • ABOVE-NATIONAL +1.1 pts vs US
  • LILA-CLUSTER 339 food-desert tracts
  • SNAP-TYPICAL 13.5% SNAP
  • VEH-OK 7.0% no vehicle
  • BOOK-MID 83 counties

Nearest low-access peer: Washington ( -0.1 pts)

Michigan's thick county book (83)

Michigan covers 83 counties among 51 states and DC (atlas inventory, not a food-access quality ranking). Orthogonal to the low-access / SNAP charts below.

Michigan vs all states by county count

Where this state's county inventory sits among every tracked jurisdiction

83 15th of 51 higher than 36 of 51 states

Jurisdictions, banded by county inventory

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USDA Food Access Research Atlas / Census county inventory · 2026-06-23

Mid-band statewide picture

About 2.3M Michigan residents (23.2%) live low-access - #30 of 50, with 339 USDA food-desert tracts.

#30
among states by low-access
2.3M
low-access residents
630K
food-desert residents
7.0%
households, no vehicle

Population-weighted tract shares. Low access = >1 mile urban / >10 miles rural from a supermarket.

Where Michigan sits on low-access

Michigan ringed at #30 of 50 by population-weighted low-access. Click any state to compare.

USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context

Signature read: 339 LILA tracts (4.08/county) .

Michigan is in the middle third nationally on low-access (23.2% , #30 of 50). SNAP averages 13.5% of households (upper SNAP band) and 7.0% have no vehicle , with 339 LILA tracts. County pressure peaks in Schoolcraft County at 46.0%.

Nationwide peers for Michigan's low-access or SNAP share

Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Michigan. Neighbourhood chart below is local poles; these panels are full-corpus nearest neighbours excluding this state.

Similar low-access share

Nearest population-weighted low-access rates (23.2% here).

Similar SNAP participation

Nearest household SNAP rates (13.5% here), deduped against the low-access panel.

Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Floor county_count ≥ 5.

Michigan low-access neighbourhood

Poles + nearest state peers, not a full national reprint

% low-access
Source USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas As of 2019 edition

Highest low-access counties in Michigan

Schoolcraft County ~0.2% of statewide low-access residents

% low-access
Source USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas As of 2019 edition

All counties in Michigan

County Low-accessSNAP
Schoolcraft County 46.0% 11.8%
Muskegon County 43.0% 19.4%
Gratiot County 39.6% 15.1%
Ingham County 38.0% 12.1%
Genesee County 35.9% 18.8%
St. Clair County 35.7% 13.3%
Otsego County 35.2% 10.5%
Mackinac County 34.6% 11.9%
Ontonagon County 34.2% 11.3%
Clinton County 34.1% 6.6%
Ottawa County 31.4% 6.0%
Eaton County 30.9% 10.1%
Jackson County 30.4% 13.7%
Kalamazoo County 30.3% 11.2%
Oakland County 30.2% 7.7%
Saginaw County 30.1% 19.6%
Keweenaw County 29.2% 7.4%
Calhoun County 29.1% 13.5%
Livingston County 28.9% 4.8%
Lenawee County 28.8% 11.1%
Luce County 28.5% 14.4%
Ionia County 27.3% 13.6%
Macomb County 27.3% 12.8%
Shiawassee County 27.3% 15.0%
Dickinson County 25.7% 8.3%
Mason County 25.7% 12.9%
Berrien County 25.2% 14.2%
Washtenaw County 25.2% 8.5%
Wexford County 24.8% 16.9%
Emmet County 23.6% 7.4%
Presque Isle County 23.2% 10.6%
Mecosta County 22.9% 14.4%
Huron County 21.1% 11.3%
Allegan County 20.8% 7.8%
Kent County 20.3% 10.3%
Chippewa County 19.8% 13.1%
Midland County 19.4% 11.7%
Marquette County 17.1% 9.6%
Grand Traverse County 17.0% 7.5%
Alpena County 15.9% 16.7%
Menominee County 15.9% 10.1%
Monroe County 15.9% 10.0%
Alcona County 15.6% 12.5%
Baraga County 15.4% 16.2%
Delta County 15.3% 12.4%
Tuscola County 15.3% 14.2%
St. Joseph County 15.2% 14.8%
Gogebic County 15.1% 18.6%
Wayne County 14.8% 23.0%
Sanilac County 14.3% 12.6%
Iron County 14.0% 13.3%
Branch County 13.6% 12.8%
Cass County 13.3% 12.8%
Roscommon County 13.3% 16.8%
Gladwin County 13.1% 16.2%
Bay County 12.9% 13.6%
Iosco County 12.9% 14.8%
Alger County 12.8% 11.0%
Houghton County 10.5% 9.7%
Manistee County 9.6% 12.1%
Cheboygan County 9.4% 12.6%
Oceana County 9.3% 15.9%
Isabella County 9.2% 11.4%
Lapeer County 7.5% 11.4%
Crawford County 6.4% 14.8%
Leelanau County 5.7% 4.7%
Hillsdale County 5.4% 12.0%
Van Buren County 4.9% 13.7%
Kalkaska County 4.6% 15.6%
Missaukee County 4.3% 12.9%
Newaygo County 4.3% 16.6%
Montmorency County 3.9% 16.8%
Clare County 2.7% 19.0%
Montcalm County 2.5% 12.8%
Oscoda County 1.6% 16.3%
Charlevoix County 1.4% 8.0%
Lake County 1.4% 19.1%
Antrim County 0.2% 10.0%
Ogemaw County 0.1% 18.3%
Osceola County 0.1% 15.1%
Arenac County 0.0% 16.1%
Barry County 0.0% 9.4%
Benzie County 0.0% 7.8%

Source: USDA ERS Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + U.S. Census Bureau ACS (2024 5-year). Sorted by low-access share, highest first.

Figures from USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and Census ACS 2024 5-year. Compiled . Methodology · All states.

PlainFoodAccess renders this state summary directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Statewide figures for Michigan are population-weighted aggregates of county Atlas and ACS records. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.