Signature · 8.7% low-access (17th pct)
Caswell County, NC
Caswell County lands in the lower national band on low-access (8.7%); supermarket distance is less binding than in the upper band, though local tracts can still diverge.
- 8.7%
- low-access pop.
- 1
- food-desert tracts
- 20.1%
- on SNAP
- 22K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Caswell County, NC
LA-MODERATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-SINGLE · SNAP-HEAVY · VEH-OK · DENSITY-MIXED
- LA-MODERATE 8.7% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -13.4 pts vs US
- LILA-SINGLE 1 food-desert tract
- SNAP-HEAVY 20.1% SNAP
- VEH-OK 6.0% no vehicle
- DENSITY-MIXED 17% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Cherokee County (+ 0.0 pts)
Lower-band low-access
Caswell County lands in the lower national band (8.7%, #2,581 of 3,079); local tracts can still diverge from the county mean.
- #2,581
- national by low-access %
- #68
- in NC
- 2
- low-access tracts
- 715
- food-desert residents
Lower-band county means still leave tract outliers on the table below.
Signature read: 8.7% low-access (17th pct) (-13.4 pts vs U.S. low-access).
How Caswell County compares nationally
Caswell County lands in the middle of the national distribution: a 8.7% low-access share that beats 17% of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data (rank #2,586).
Caswell County's lower-band USDA tier split
6 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 1 LILA.
By USDA urbanicity classification, Caswell County has 0 urban and 6 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Caswell County vs nearby low low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in North Carolina, not a full county-board reprint
- Hyde
Hyde 60.5%
60.5 % low-access
- Caswell 8.7
Caswell 8.7%
8.7 % low-access
- Cherokee 8.7
Cherokee 8.7%
8.7 % low-access
- Orange 8.7
Orange 8.7%
8.7 % low-access
- Robeson 8.5
Robeson 8.5%
8.5 % low-access
- Anson 8.4
Anson 8.4%
8.4 % low-access
- Greene 0.1
Greene 0.1%
0.1 % low-access
FARA 2019 · lower low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 6 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 23,719 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 2 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 1 |
| Low-Access Population | 2,053 |
| Low-Access Share | 8.7%well below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 715 |
ACS 2024 · elevated SNAP band
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 22,404 |
| Median Household Income | $59,755 |
| Poverty Rate | 18.6%above the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,778 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 20.1%well above the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 6.0%below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 5.6% |
SNAP retailers in Caswell County
Caswell County has 24 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 4 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 14 locations (58% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 14
- ashland grocery & grill, reidsville
- buckys grocery, pelham
- city mart, ruffin
- friendly corner, yanceyville
- kwik 3 points grocery & grill #2, prospect hill
- leasburg grocery, leasburg
- lucksters farm market, mebane
- ma barker, semora
- pagetown curb market, reidsville
- quick & easy 7, yanceyville
- sam's corner 2, pelham
- smiths corner store, ruffin
- yanceyville mart, yanceyville
- yoder's country market llc, blanch
Combination Grocery/Other · 8
- dollar general 3928, yanceyville
- dollar general 11652, prospect hill
- dollar general 13809, semora
- dollar general 20498, leasburg
- dollar general 20712, providence
- dollar general 22537, pelham
- dollar general 25445, mebane
- family dollar 1698, yanceyville
Farmers' Market · 1
- caswell county farmers market, yanceyvill
Supermarket · 1
- food lion 842, yanceyville
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in North Carolina
One of 99 counties in North Carolina, 6 are shown here.
Compare Caswell County vs Alamance County → · All North Carolina counties →
Counties near Caswell County's lower low-access or SNAP band
Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Caswell County, both outside North Carolina so the neighborhoods are not the same-state county list above.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside NC (8.7% here).
- Bedford County, VA · 8.7% low-access
- Bedford County, VA · 8.7% low-access
- Randolph County, WV · 8.7% low-access
- Randolph County, WV · 8.7% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside NC (20.1% here).
- Washington County, MO · 20.1% SNAP
- Washington County, MO · 20.1% SNAP
- Westmoreland County, VA · 20.1% SNAP
- Westmoreland County, VA · 20.1% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Caswell County inside a lower low-access state context
Caswell County sits inside North Carolina (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Caswell County, NC are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 37033. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.