Signature · 6.0% low-access (12th pct)
Cleburne County, AL
Cleburne County lands in the lower national band on low-access (6.0%); supermarket distance is less binding than in the upper band, though local tracts can still diverge.
- 6.0%
- low-access pop.
- 0
- food-desert tracts
- 14.5%
- on SNAP
- 15K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Cleburne County, AL
LA-ADEQUATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-NONE · SNAP-HEAVY · VEH-OK · DENSITY-CLEAR
- LA-ADEQUATE 6.0% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -16.1 pts vs US
- LILA-NONE 0 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-HEAVY 14.5% SNAP
- VEH-OK 5.6% no vehicle
- DENSITY-CLEAR 0% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Blount County (+ 0.8 pts)
Lower-band low-access
Cleburne County lands in the lower national band (6.0%, #2,761 of 3,079); local tracts can still diverge from the county mean.
- #2,761
- national by low-access %
- #60
- in AL
- 0
- low-access tracts
- 303
- food-desert residents
Lower-band county means still leave tract outliers on the table below.
Signature read: 6.0% low-access (12th pct) (-16.1 pts vs U.S. low-access).
How Cleburne County compares nationally
Food access in Cleburne County compares favorably nationally: its 6.0% low-access share is lower than the vast majority of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data, higher than only 12% of them (rank #2,765).
Cleburne County's lower-band USDA tier split
4 census tracts grouped by USDA classification .
By USDA urbanicity classification, Cleburne County has 0 urban and 4 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Cleburne County vs nearby low low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Alabama, not a full county-board reprint
- Bullock
Bullock 68.5%
68.5 % low-access
- Tallapoosa 7.5
Tallapoosa 7.5%
7.5 % low-access
- Clay 7
Clay 7%
7 % low-access
- Blount 6.8
Blount 6.8%
6.8 % low-access
- Cleburne 6
Cleburne 6%
6 % low-access
- Pickens 4.2
Pickens 4.2%
4.2 % low-access
- DeKalb 0
DeKalb 0%
0 % low-access
FARA 2019 · lower low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 4 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 14,972 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 0 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 0 |
| Low-Access Population | 891 |
| Low-Access Share | 6.0%well below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 303 |
Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 15,426 |
| Median Household Income | $55,345 |
| Poverty Rate | 13.7%near the national average |
| SNAP Households | 867 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 14.5%above the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 5.6%below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 1.0% |
Thick SNAP store book in Cleburne County
Cleburne County has 27 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 4 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 17 locations (63% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 17
- abel mall, delta
- cheaha country store, heflin
- circle k store 2709326, heflin
- country boys, ranburne
- fruithurst general store inc, fruithurst
- gx alabama llc d/b/a bp food mart 208, heflin
- heflin mini mart n/a, heflin
- love's travel stop 818, heflin
- maa brahmani llc, ranburne
- radiant food store 2, heflin
- rosewood corner, llc, muscadine
- shree verai mata inc, heflin
- sparkle mart, heflin
- stop-n-shop 0, muscadine
- texaco 35, heflin
- the green stores 5, heflin
- weigles 2, heflin
Combination Grocery/Other · 7
- dollar general 3779, heflin
- dollar general 5842, ranburne
- dollar general store 6147, heflin
- dollar general 18302, fruithurst
- dollar general 25931, heflin
- family dollar 12589, heflin
- family dollar 13646, heflin
Supermarket · 2
- piggly wiggly 55, heflin
- wm grocery, heflin
Meat/Poultry Specialty · 1
- daniel jackson meat processing, ranburne
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Alabama
One of 66 counties in Alabama, 6 are shown here.
Compare Cleburne County vs Autauga County → · All Alabama counties →
Counties near Cleburne County's lower low-access or SNAP band
Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Cleburne County, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not the same-state county list above.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside AL (6.0% here).
- St. Helena Parish, LA · 6.0% low-access
- St. Helena Parish, LA · 6.0% low-access
- Prentiss County, MS · 6.0% low-access
- Prentiss County, MS · 6.0% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside AL (14.5% here).
- Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT · 14.5% SNAP
- Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT · 14.5% SNAP
- Carroll County, GA · 14.5% SNAP
- Carroll County, GA · 14.5% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Cleburne County inside a lower low-access state context
Cleburne County sits inside Alabama (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Cleburne County, AL are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 01029. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.