Signature · 1 LILA tracts (33.3% of tracts)
Coosa County, AL
Coosa County's signature pressure is desert tracts: 1 LILA tracts (33.3% of the book) alongside 22.6% low-access.
- 22.6%
- low-access pop.
- 1
- food-desert tracts
- 16.2%
- on SNAP
- 10K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Coosa County, AL
LA-ELEVATED · PHOTO-FINISH · LILA-SINGLE · SNAP-HEAVY · VEH-OK · DENSITY-DENSE
- LA-ELEVATED 22.6% low-access
- PHOTO-FINISH +0.5 pts vs US
- LILA-SINGLE 1 food-desert tract
- SNAP-HEAVY 16.2% SNAP
- VEH-OK 6.0% no vehicle
- DENSITY-DENSE 33% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Morgan County (+ 0.0 pts)
The food-access picture
According to the USDA Food Access Research Atlas, Coosa County ranks #1,473 of 3,079 U.S. counties by low-access share and #28 of 66 counties in AL (22.6% low-access; 1 food-desert tracts).
- #1,473
- national by low-access %
- #28
- in AL
- 2
- low-access tracts
- 890
- food-desert residents
Low access = living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket. Food deserts add a low-income condition (USDA LILA).
Signature read: 1 LILA tracts (33.3% of tracts) .
How Coosa County compares nationally
Relative to the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA food-access data, Coosa County's 22.6% low-access share is elevated, higher than 53% of them and ranked #1,473 most-affected nationwide.
Coosa County: USDA Food-Access Tier Breakdown
3 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 1 LILA.
All 3 of Coosa County's tracts are rural in the USDA classification, so every one is judged on the 10-mile test: a resident counts as low-access only when the nearest supermarket is more than 10 miles away.
Coosa County low-access neighbourhood
Poles + nearest peers in Alabama, not a full county-board reprint
- Bullock
Bullock 68.5%
68.5 % low-access
- Dale 23.1
Dale 23.1%
23.1 % low-access
- Henry 22.9
Henry 22.9%
22.9 % low-access
- Coosa 22.6
Coosa 22.6%
22.6 % low-access
- Morgan 22.6
Morgan 22.6%
22.6 % low-access
- Marshall 22.3
Marshall 22.3%
22.3 % low-access
- DeKalb 0
DeKalb 0%
0 % low-access
Food Access (USDA FARA 2019)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 3 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 11,539 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 2 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 1 |
| Low-Access Population | 2,606 |
| Low-Access Share | 22.6%near the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 890 |
Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 10,300 |
| Median Household Income | $57,355 |
| Poverty Rate | 13.1%near the national average |
| SNAP Households | 716 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 16.2%above the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 6.0%below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 3.0% |
SNAP retailers in Coosa County
Coosa County has 8 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 3 store categories. Combination Grocery/Other lead with 4 locations (50% of the total), followed by convenience store.
Where the store book sits, by town
3 towns share the 8 authorized stores; Goodwater holds 38% of them. 2 of the 3 towns have no grocery-grade outlet, only convenience or dollar/combination stores: Kellyton, Rockford.
| Town | SNAP stores | Grocery-grade |
|---|---|---|
| Goodwater | 3 | 1 |
| Kellyton | 3 | none |
| Rockford | 2 | none |
Combination Grocery/Other · 4
- dollar general 6057, rockford
- dollar general 20945, kellyton
- dollar general 22066, kellyton
- dollar general 9841, goodwater
Convenience Store · 3
- allens brew market #49, goodwater
- kellyton express, kellyton
- mapco express, inc. 5189, rockford
Supermarket · 1
- piggly wiggly 239, goodwater
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Alabama
One of 66 counties in Alabama, 6 are shown here.
Compare Coosa County vs Autauga County → · All Alabama counties →
Nationwide peers for Coosa County's low-access or SNAP share
Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Coosa County, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not the same-state county list above.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside AL (22.6% here).
- Santa Cruz County, CA · 22.6% low-access
- Cedar County, IA · 22.6% low-access
- LaSalle Parish, LA · 22.6% low-access
- Howard County, MD · 22.6% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside AL (16.2% here).
- Baldwin County, GA · 16.2% SNAP
- Lowndes County, GA · 16.2% SNAP
- Morgan County, IL · 16.2% SNAP
- St. Clair County, IL · 16.2% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Alabama among East South Central states
Alabama ranks 3rd of 4 East South Central states by population-weighted low-access (24.5%). Coosa County, at 22.6%, runs 1.9 pts below the Alabama rate.
- Tennessee 27.2%
- Mississippi 26.4%
- Alabama 24.5%
- Kentucky 19.8%
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted by state; divisions per the U.S. Census Bureau. National state map
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Coosa County, AL are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 01037. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.