Signature · 24.6% SNAP (98th pct in MO)
Dunklin County, MO
Dunklin County stands out on SNAP (24.6%, +12.5 pts vs U.S.) with 11.3% low-access from USDA FARA 2019.
- 11.3%
- low-access pop.
- 3
- food-desert tracts
- 24.6%
- on SNAP
- 27K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Dunklin County, MO
LA-MODERATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-POCKET · SNAP-HEAVY · VEH-TYPICAL · DENSITY-DENSE
- LA-MODERATE 11.3% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -10.8 pts vs US
- LILA-POCKET 3 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-HEAVY 24.6% SNAP
- VEH-TYPICAL 8.5% no vehicle
- DENSITY-DENSE 30% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Osage County ( -0.2 pts)
Lower-band low-access
Dunklin County lands in the lower national band (11.3%, #2,389 of 3,079); local tracts can still diverge from the county mean.
- #2,389
- national by low-access %
- #86
- in MO
- 3
- low-access tracts
- 2K
- food-desert residents
Lower-band county means still leave tract outliers on the table below.
Signature read: 24.6% SNAP (98th pct in MO) (+12.5 pts vs U.S. SNAP) .
How Dunklin County compares nationally
Dunklin County lands in the middle of the national distribution: a 11.3% low-access share that beats 24% of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data (rank #2,391).
Dunklin County's lower-band USDA tier split
10 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 3 LILA.
By USDA urbanicity classification, Dunklin County has 4 urban and 6 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Dunklin County vs nearby low low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Missouri, not a full county-board reprint
- Mercer
Mercer 99.8%
99.8 % low-access
- Clinton 11.7
Clinton 11.7%
11.7 % low-access
- Dunklin 11.3
Dunklin 11.3%
11.3 % low-access
- Osage 11.1
Osage 11.1%
11.1 % low-access
- Moniteau 11
Moniteau 11%
11 % low-access
- Franklin 10.6
Franklin 10.6%
10.6 % low-access
- Mississippi 3
Mississippi 3%
3 % low-access
FARA 2019 · lower low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 10 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 31,953 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 3 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 3 |
| Low-Access Population | 3,626 |
| Low-Access Share | 11.3%well below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 1,724 |
ACS 2024 · elevated SNAP band
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 27,493 |
| Median Household Income | $47,849 |
| Poverty Rate | 22.0%well above the national average |
| SNAP Households | 2,765 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 24.6%well above the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 8.5%near the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 2.7% |
Thick SNAP store book in Dunklin County
Dunklin County has 35 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 4 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 17 locations (49% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 17
- adams kwik mart, kennett
- captains mart 17, clarkton
- casey's 1899, malden
- casey's 2065, kennett
- casey's 2187, campbell
- casey's 2234, kennett
- casey's general store 2082, malden
- casey's general store 2255, senath
- express food shop, campbell
- exxon 2, kennett
- holcomb junction, holcomb
- huck's 321, kennett
- murphy usa 6763, kennett
- quick stop #1, cardwell
- reliance 601 601, malden
- rhodes convenience stores 265, malden
- s&s 5 llc, malden
Combination Grocery/Other · 11
- dollar general 10883, clarkton
- dollar general 11779, senath
- dollar general 1225, malden
- dollar general 13272, cardwell
- dollar general 25303, holcomb
- dollar general 3038, kennett
- dollar general 7625, campbell
- dollar tree 2194, kennett
- dollar tree 5686, malden
- family dollar 13629, campbell
- family dollar 3524, kennett
Super Store · 5
- harps food store 287, malden
- harps food store 292, clarkton
- harps food store 499, kennett
- walmart 453, malden
- walmart sc 190, kennett
Supermarket · 2
- faulkners grocery, arbyrd
- vancil iga, campbell
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Missouri
One of 114 counties in Missouri, 6 are shown here.
Compare Dunklin County vs Adair County → · All Missouri counties →
Counties near Dunklin County's lower low-access or SNAP band
SNAP-led peer set first for Dunklin County (24.6%), with low-access neighbours deduped against it, both outside Missouri.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside MO (11.3% here).
- Waldo County, ME · 11.3% low-access
- Waldo County, ME · 11.3% low-access
- Guthrie County, IA · 11.3% low-access
- Guthrie County, IA · 11.3% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside MO (24.6% here).
- Richland Parish, LA · 24.6% SNAP
- Richland Parish, LA · 24.6% SNAP
- Jefferson County, OR · 24.7% SNAP
- Haywood County, TN · 24.7% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Dunklin County inside a lower low-access state context
Dunklin County sits inside Missouri (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Dunklin County, MO are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 29069. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.