Signature · 3 LILA tracts (42.9% of tracts)
Prince George County, VA
Prince George County's signature pressure is desert tracts: 3 LILA tracts (42.9% of the book) alongside 33.9% low-access.
- 33.9%
- low-access pop.
- 3
- food-desert tracts
- 11.0%
- on SNAP
- 43K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Prince George County, VA
LA-ELEVATED · ABOVE-NATIONAL · LILA-POCKET · SNAP-TYPICAL · VEH-OK · DENSITY-DENSE
- LA-ELEVATED 33.9% low-access
- ABOVE-NATIONAL +11.8 pts vs US
- LILA-POCKET 3 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-TYPICAL 11.0% SNAP
- VEH-OK 3.3% no vehicle
- DENSITY-DENSE 43% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Orange County ( -0.1 pts)
Upper-band low-access
Prince George County sits in the upper national band (33.9%, #676 of 3,079) with 3 LILA tracts.
- #676
- national by low-access %
- #18
- in VA
- 5
- low-access tracts
- 2K
- food-desert residents
Upper-band counties often pair elevated low-access with clustered LILA tracts. Low access = >1 mile urban / >10 miles rural.
Signature read: 3 LILA tracts (42.9% of tracts) .
How Prince George County compares nationally
Relative to the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA food-access data, Prince George County's 33.9% low-access share is elevated, higher than 78% of them and ranked #678 most-affected nationwide.
Prince George County's elevated USDA tier split
7 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 3 LILA.
By USDA urbanicity classification, Prince George County has 3 urban and 4 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Prince George County vs nearby high low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Virginia, not a full county-board reprint
- Highland
Highland 99.7%
99.7 % low-access
- York 34.4
York 34.4%
34.4 % low-access
- Prince George 33.9
Prince George 33.9%
33.9 % low-access
- Orange 33.8
Orange 33.8%
33.8 % low-access
- Charlotte 33.7
Charlotte 33.7%
33.7 % low-access
- Frederick 33.7
Frederick 33.7%
33.7 % low-access
- Dickenson 0
Dickenson 0%
0 % low-access
FARA 2019 · elevated low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 7 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 35,725 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 5 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 3 |
| Low-Access Population | 12,127 |
| Low-Access Share | 33.9%well above the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 2,482 |
Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 43,146 |
| Median Household Income | $84,897 |
| Poverty Rate | 8.9%below the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,425 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 11.0%near the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 3.3%well below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 19.2% |
SNAP retailers in Prince George County
Prince George County has 22 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 5 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 13 locations (59% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 13
- aplus 40021h, south prince george
- ashkar mart, disputanta
- breez-in 9, north prince george
- carson market, carson
- davis express 105, prince george
- hopewell shell, north prince george
- love's travel shop 717, disputanta
- pilot travel center 4656, disputanta
- prince george bp, south prince george
- prince mini mart, prince george
- sheetz 667, prince george
- sheetz 795, disputanta
- us gas, south prince george
Combination Grocery/Other · 5
- big lots 3130, north prince george
- dollar general 11737, prince george
- dollar general 12791, disputanta
- dollar general 16460, south prince george
- dollar general 20456, north prince george
Supermarket · 2
- food lion 1451, prince george
- new dixie mart 218, south prince george
Farmers' Market · 1
- prince george county farmer's market, prince george
Military Commissary · 1
- fort lee commissary 2811, fort lee
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Virginia
One of 132 counties in Virginia, 6 are shown here.
Compare Prince George County vs Accomack County → · All Virginia counties →
Counties near Prince George County's elevated low-access or SNAP band
Two USDA/ACS-derived peer sets for Prince George County, both outside Virginia so the neighborhoods are not the same-state county list above.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside VA (33.9% here).
- Starr County, TX · 33.9% low-access
- Starr County, TX · 33.9% low-access
- Meigs County, OH · 33.9% low-access
- Meigs County, OH · 33.9% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside VA (11.0% here).
- Van Zandt County, TX · 11.0% SNAP
- Van Zandt County, TX · 11.0% SNAP
- Shawano County, WI · 11.0% SNAP
- Shawano County, WI · 11.0% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Prince George County inside a higher low-access state context
Prince George County sits inside Virginia (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Prince George County, VA are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 51149. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.