Signature · 15.0% SNAP (99th pct in IN)
Randolph County, IN
Randolph County stands out on SNAP (15.0%, +2.9 pts vs U.S.) with 17.6% low-access from USDA FARA 2019.
- 17.6%
- low-access pop.
- 3
- food-desert tracts
- 15.0%
- on SNAP
- 24K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Randolph County, IN
LA-MODERATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-POCKET · SNAP-HEAVY · VEH-OK · DENSITY-DENSE
- LA-MODERATE 17.6% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -4.5 pts vs US
- LILA-POCKET 3 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-HEAVY 15.0% SNAP
- VEH-OK 6.6% no vehicle
- DENSITY-DENSE 38% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Adams County ( -0.1 pts)
The food-access picture
According to the USDA Food Access Research Atlas, Randolph County ranks #1,904 of 3,079 U.S. counties by low-access share and #46 of 89 counties in IN (17.6% low-access; 3 food-desert tracts).
- #1,904
- national by low-access %
- #46
- in IN
- 3
- low-access tracts
- 2K
- food-desert residents
Low access = living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket. Food deserts add a low-income condition (USDA LILA).
Signature read: 15.0% SNAP (99th pct in IN) (+2.9 pts vs U.S. SNAP) .
How Randolph County compares nationally
Randolph County lands in the middle of the national distribution: a 17.6% low-access share that beats 39% of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data (rank #1,907).
Randolph County: USDA Food-Access Tier Breakdown
8 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 3 LILA.
By USDA urbanicity classification, Randolph County has 3 urban and 5 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Randolph County low-access neighbourhood
Poles + nearest peers in Indiana, not a full county-board reprint
- Hendricks
Hendricks 51.5%
51.5 % low-access
- Scott 18
Scott 18%
18 % low-access
- Boone 17.9
Boone 17.9%
17.9 % low-access
- Randolph 17.6
Randolph 17.6%
17.6 % low-access
- Adams 17.5
Adams 17.5%
17.5 % low-access
- Grant 17.2
Grant 17.2%
17.2 % low-access
- Harrison 0
Harrison 0%
0 % low-access
Food Access (USDA FARA 2019)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 8 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 26,171 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 3 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 3 |
| Low-Access Population | 4,619 |
| Low-Access Share | 17.6%below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 2,056 |
ACS 2024 · elevated SNAP band
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 24,387 |
| Median Household Income | $60,791 |
| Poverty Rate | 15.8%above the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,552 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 15.0%above the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 6.6%below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 1.4% |
SNAP retailers in Randolph County
Randolph County has 23 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 6 store categories. Combination Grocery/Other lead with 11 locations (48% of the total), followed by convenience store.
Combination Grocery/Other · 11
- cvs 6620, winchester
- dollar general 1160, union city
- dollar general 1576, winchester
- dollar general 11891, lynn
- dollar general 11994, losantville
- dollar general 12235, farmland
- dollar general 12649, ridgeville
- dollar general 23853, parker city
- family dollar 13602, winchester
- family dollar store 1605, union city
- family dollar store 7695, parker city
Convenience Store · 7
- casey's 3843, winchester
- faizan gas & food, losantville
- ls95 inc, union city
- lynn foodmart llc, lynn
- union city mart, union city
- village pantry 5467, winchester
- village pantry 5525, farmland
Medium Grocery Store · 2
- jason's meat market, winchester
- losantville discount grocery llc, losantville
Farmers' Market · 1
- winchester farmers market, winchester
Super Store · 1
- walmart supercenter 1480, winchester
Supermarket · 1
- uni0n city save-a-lot 24135, union city
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Indiana
One of 91 counties in Indiana, 6 are shown here.
Compare Randolph County vs Adams County → · All Indiana counties →
Nationwide peers for Randolph County's low-access or SNAP share
SNAP-led peer set first for Randolph County (15.0%), with low-access neighbours deduped against it, both outside Indiana.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside IN (17.6% here).
- Mason County, KY · 17.6% low-access
- Mason County, KY · 17.6% low-access
- Orleans Parish, LA · 17.6% low-access
- Orleans Parish, LA · 17.6% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside IN (15.0% here).
- Escambia County, FL · 15.0% SNAP
- Escambia County, FL · 15.0% SNAP
- Shiawassee County, MI · 15.0% SNAP
- Shiawassee County, MI · 15.0% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Food access nationally, Indiana in context
Randolph County sits inside Indiana (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Randolph County, IN are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 18135. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.