Signature · 11.0% SNAP (87th pct in MN)
Mille Lacs County, MN
Mille Lacs County stands out on SNAP (11.0%, -1.1 pts vs U.S.) with 7.8% low-access from USDA FARA 2019.
- 7.8%
- low-access pop.
- 2
- food-desert tracts
- 11.0%
- on SNAP
- 27K
- residents (ACS 2024)
USDA FARA access plate
County Mille Lacs County, MN
LA-ADEQUATE · BELOW-NATIONAL · LILA-POCKET · SNAP-TYPICAL · VEH-OK · DENSITY-DENSE
- LA-ADEQUATE 7.8% low-access
- BELOW-NATIONAL -14.3 pts vs US
- LILA-POCKET 2 food-desert tracts
- SNAP-TYPICAL 11.0% SNAP
- VEH-OK 5.5% no vehicle
- DENSITY-DENSE 29% tracts LILA
Nearest low-access peer: Wadena County ( -0.4 pts)
Lower-band low-access
Mille Lacs County lands in the lower national band (7.8%, #2,661 of 3,079); local tracts can still diverge from the county mean.
- #2,661
- national by low-access %
- #82
- in MN
- 2
- low-access tracts
- 684
- food-desert residents
Lower-band county means still leave tract outliers on the table below.
Signature read: 11.0% SNAP (87th pct in MN) (-1.1 pts vs U.S. SNAP) .
How Mille Lacs County compares nationally
Food access in Mille Lacs County compares favorably nationally: its 7.8% low-access share is lower than the vast majority of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data, higher than only 15% of them (rank #2,662).
Mille Lacs County's lower-band USDA tier split
7 census tracts grouped by USDA classification · 2 LILA.
By USDA urbanicity classification, Mille Lacs County has 1 urban and 6 rural census tracts. The 1-mile (urban) vs 10-mile (rural) distance threshold above applies per tract, so a county's access rate reflects this mix.
Mille Lacs County vs nearby low low-access peers
Poles + nearest peers in Minnesota, not a full county-board reprint
- Red Lake
Red Lake 99.2%
99.2 % low-access
- Wabasha 10.5
Wabasha 10.5%
10.5 % low-access
- Cottonwood 8.8
Cottonwood 8.8%
8.8 % low-access
- Mille Lacs 7.8
Mille Lacs 7.8%
7.8 % low-access
- Wadena 7.4
Wadena 7.4%
7.4 % low-access
- Le Sueur 5
Le Sueur 5%
5 % low-access
- Fillmore 2.7
Fillmore 2.7%
2.7 % low-access
FARA 2019 · lower low-access
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 7 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 26,097 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 2 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 2 |
| Low-Access Population | 2,038 |
| Low-Access Share | 7.8%well below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 684 |
ACS 2024 · elevated SNAP band
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 27,125 |
| Median Household Income | $72,729 |
| Poverty Rate | 10.4%below the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,170 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 11.0%near the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 5.5%below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 1.7% |
Thick SNAP store book in Mille Lacs County
Mille Lacs County has 26 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 6 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 11 locations (42% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 11
- casey's 3781, onamia
- casey's general store 1128, princeton
- casey's general store 1847, milaca
- casey's general store 1853, princeton
- federated co-ops inc. - isle cenex 019, isle
- holiday station 2746171, milaca
- holiday stationstore 2746017, princeton
- holiday stationstore 2746540, milaca
- kwik trip 1026, milaca
- kwik trip 928, princeton
- trailside convenience bait & tackle, isle
Combination Grocery/Other · 7
- dollar general 14576, milaca
- dollar general 19385, onamia
- dollar general 15570, north isle
- dollar general 30502, foreston
- dollar tree 6751, princeton
- family dollar 13550, isle
- smokin' mortars bbq & meat market, isle
Super Store · 4
- coborn's marketplace 2019, princeton
- teal's market, isle
- teal's market-milaca, milaca
- walmart supercenter 3102, princeton
Supermarket · 2
- aldi 72102, princeton
- mikes discount foods 6, princeton
Bakery Specialty · 1
- papa murphy's princeton mn114, princeton
Large Grocery Store · 1
- grand market, onamia
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator (currently authorized stores, a live third population, not the 2019 Atlas or ACS 2024 snapshot above).
Other Counties in Minnesota
One of 86 counties in Minnesota, 6 are shown here.
Compare Mille Lacs County vs Aitkin County → · All Minnesota counties →
Counties near Mille Lacs County's lower low-access or SNAP band
SNAP-led peer set first for Mille Lacs County (11.0%), with low-access neighbours deduped against it, both outside Minnesota.
Similar low-access share
Nearest low-access rates outside MN (7.8% here).
- Carter County, KY · 7.8% low-access
- Carter County, KY · 7.8% low-access
- Anderson County, KY · 7.8% low-access
- Anderson County, KY · 7.8% low-access
Similar SNAP participation
Nearest household SNAP rates outside MN (11.0% here).
- George County, MS · 11.0% SNAP
- George County, MS · 11.0% SNAP
- Barry County, MO · 11.0% SNAP
- Barry County, MO · 11.0% SNAP
Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) + Census ACS 2024 SNAP. Peers floor at 10,000 residents so stub counties cannot own the match.
Mille Lacs County inside a lower low-access state context
Mille Lacs County sits inside Minnesota (ringed). Each state is colored by population-weighted low-access; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Read with this county
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019) · U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates · methodology · compiled .
PlainFoodAccess renders this county profile directly from the USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2019) and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates), no number is typed in by an editor. Figures for Mille Lacs County, MN are computed from the joined Atlas and ACS records for FIPS 27095. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-06-23. Primary sources: USDA Food Access Research Atlas and Census ACS 5-year estimates.
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.