County food-access profile · Michigan
Roscommon County, MI
Roscommon County's food-access picture is close to the national norm, with pockets that qualify as low-access. This profile breaks down who qualifies as a food desert and the income, SNAP, and vehicle-access context behind it.
- 13.3%
- low-access pop.
- 1
- food-desert tracts
- 16.8%
- on SNAP
- 24K
- residents (ACS 2024)
The food-access picture
13.3% of Roscommon County residents live in a low-access area, and 1 of its 10 census tracts are USDA-designated food deserts.
- 1
- low-access tracts
- 1K
- food-desert residents
- 6.8%
- households, no vehicle
- 15.5%
- below poverty line
Low access = living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket. Food deserts add a low-income condition (USDA LILA, 1-and-10-mile measure).
Roscommon County's low-access share sits near the national share, at 13.3% per the USDA Atlas. 1 of the county's 10 census tracts are flagged low-access, covering roughly 3,259 residents who live far from a supermarket. 1 of those also meet the low-income condition that defines a food desert, home to roughly 1,439 low-income residents.
How the USDA defines low-access and food-desert tracts
The USDA measures food access by distance to the nearest supermarket. A census tract is "low-access" when a meaningful share of residents live more than one mile from a supermarket in urban areas, or more than ten miles in rural areas. A tract becomes a "food desert" only when it is both low-access and low-income, because distance is far harder to overcome for households without a car or a cushion in the budget. Counts on this page are aggregated from the tract level, where the federal data is actually published, so a single county figure can hide neighbourhoods that are much better or much worse served than the average. Distance also does not capture everything that shapes whether a family eats well: the presence of a full-service grocer rather than a convenience store, public transit, food pantries, and the price and quality of what is on the shelf all matter beyond the radius the Atlas can draw.
How Roscommon County compares nationally
Roscommon County lands in the middle of the national distribution: a 13.3% low-access share that beats 28% of the 3,133 U.S. counties with USDA data (rank #2,255).
Roscommon County: USDA Food-Access Tier Breakdown
All 10 census tracts in Roscommon County, grouped by USDA classification (see "How the USDA defines low-access and food-desert tracts" above for what each tier means).
Roscommon County vs. other Michigan counties
Share of the population living in low-access areas, compared with other counties in Michigan
- Roscommon
Roscommon County, MI
13.3 % low-access
- Alcona
Alcona County, MI
15.6 % low-access
- Alger
Alger County, MI
12.8 % low-access
- Allegan
Allegan County, MI
20.8 % low-access
- Alpena
Alpena County, MI
15.9 % low-access
- Antrim 0.2
Antrim County, MI
0.2 % low-access
Food Access (USDA FARA 2019)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Census Tracts | 10 |
| Atlas Population (2010 basis) | 24,449 |
| Low-Access Tracts | 1 |
| Food-Desert Tracts (low-income & low-access) | 1 |
| Low-Access Population | 3,259 |
| Low-Access Share | 13.3%below the national average |
| Low-Income & Low-Access Population | 1,439 |
Demographics & Assistance (Census ACS 2024)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 23,737 |
| Median Household Income | $55,246 |
| Poverty Rate | 15.5%near the national average |
| SNAP Households | 1,946 |
| SNAP Participation Rate | 16.8%above the national average |
| Households Without a Vehicle | 6.8%below the national average |
| Group-Quarters Population | 1.0% |
About 16.8% of Roscommon County households receive SNAP, versus a U.S. county median in the 11–13% range (Census ACS).
What this means
- 13.3% of residents are low-access, near the national share for U.S. counties.
- 16.8% of households receive SNAP, the federal program that offsets food costs for 1,946 households here.
- 6.8% of households have no vehicle, the hidden multiplier that turns distance into a real barrier.
- 1 tract meet the USDA food-desert threshold (low-income and low-access).
USDA low-access figures reflect the 2019 Atlas (2010 tract populations); socioeconomic context is the latest Census ACS 5-year (2024).
What the food-access data shows for Roscommon County
near the national share
1 of Roscommon County's 10 census tracts are USDA-designated food deserts, low-income areas where many residents also live far from a supermarket, about 10.0% of all its tracts.
An estimated 3,259 residents, roughly 13.3% of the county's 2010 population, live in one of these low-access areas.
Of those, 1,439 are also low-income, the group most exposed to genuine food hardship, since limited transportation compounds a limited budget.
The remaining 9 tracts (90.0%) meet the USDA's adequate-access threshold.
SNAP retailers in Roscommon County
Roscommon County has 36 stores currently authorized to accept SNAP (EBT) benefits, across 8 store categories. Convenience Store lead with 15 locations (42% of the total), followed by combination grocery/other.
Convenience Store · 15
- admiral 5829, houghton lake
- beacon & bridge market 34, houghton lake
- family ez mart 424, prudenville
- forward shell roscommon 152, roscommon
- forward shell-st helen 118, saint helen
- four seasons, houghton lake
- hines haus, houghton lake
- houghton lake 273, houghton lake
- next door food store 5015, prudenville
- sunrise stores llc 20, saint helen
- sunrise stores llc 27, houghton lake
- satnam gas, houghton lake
- south state park market, roscommon
- town & country bp, roscommon
- twinkle, houghton lake
Combination Grocery/Other · 12
- dollar general 6307, saint helen
- dollar general 8780, houghton lake
- dollar general 13470, roscommon
- dollar general 19946, houghton lake
- dollar general 20182, roscommon
- dollar general 23386, roscommon
- dollar general 24496, saint helen
- dollar tree 5369, houghton lake
- family dollar 6047, roscommon
- family dollar store 1939, roscommon
- r&j's west shore marketplace, houghton lake
- walgreens 10489, prudenville
Supermarket · 3
- family fare 1501, houghton lake
- louie's fresh market st helen 655, saint helen
- save-a-lot 24478, houghton lake
Super Store · 2
- family fare 1516, roscommon
- walmart 2014, houghton lake
Fruits/Veg Specialty · 1
- barts fruit market 1, prudenville
Large Grocery Store · 1
- r & j's best choice market, houghton lake
Meat/Poultry Specialty · 1
- the lake house meats and deli, houghton lake
Medium Grocery Store · 1
- bob's butcher shop llc, roscommon
Source: USDA SNAP Retailer Locator, currently authorized retailers.
Other Counties in Michigan
Compare Roscommon County vs Alcona County → · All Michigan counties →
Food access nationally, Michigan in context
Roscommon County sits inside Michigan (ringed). Each state is colored by its population-weighted low-access share; click any state to compare.
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019), population-weighted · Census ACS 2024 context
Understand the Data
Frequently Asked Questions
What share of Roscommon County has low food access? ▼
What is the SNAP participation rate in Roscommon County? ▼
What is the poverty rate in Roscommon County? ▼
Is Roscommon County a food desert? ▼
What share of Roscommon County households lack a vehicle? ▼
Data Sources & Methodology
USDA Economic Research Service, Food Access Research Atlas (2019): low-access and food-desert tract classifications, low-access population, and low-income low-access counts. ers.usda.gov/food-access-research-atlas
U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2024 5-Year Estimates: population, median income, poverty, SNAP participation, vehicle access, and group quarters. census.gov/programs-surveys/acs
Low access is defined as living more than 1 mile (urban) or 10 miles (rural) from the nearest supermarket; a food desert adds a low-income condition. Read the full methodology →
Data current as of (most recent source-data vintage; figures reflect the 2019 USDA Atlas and 2024 Census ACS).
Note: This page presents public USDA and Census data for informational purposes and is not professional advice. Figures reflect the cited dataset vintages and may differ from the most recent local conditions. How this data is sourced & verified.